|
EXCLUSIVE:
The overlooked terrorist danger:
THE MEXICAN ID CARD THAT COULD BE AN ASSAULT ON
US IMMIGRATION LAW -- AND AN AID TO TERRORISTS
The Mexican government has begun widely issuing identification cards to
Mexican nationals under the guise of consular protection, but the card
appears to have little use except to thwart US immigration policies --and
it could offer entree to terrorists.
Called the Matricula Consular, the cards have been issued to
Mexican citizens for years, but recent alterations in the way the cards
are distributed indicate a covert attempt to aid undocumented aliens
inside the US in illegally gaining benefits usually reserved for US
citizens.
The card, which
includes a photograph of the bearer along with a hologram for authenticity
and a logo for the Mexican government (with a US address), is
traditionally issued to Mexican nationals who travel abroad and want to
establish their nation of origin for official purposes.
The card does little more than
establish Mexico as the bearer's home; it confers no legal rights outside
of Mexico and is recognized only inside Mexico or by Mexican
representatives in other nations, including the US.
But it's
the look of the card that is confusing to Americans, and illegal aliens
have begun presenting the card as a way to establish identity for the
purpose of buying or renting homes and cars, getting jobs and applying for
drivers licenses, social security cards and social services such as Aid to
Dependent Children and Medicaid.
Using the cards, illegal
aliens have been establishing bank accounts and have been transferring
money, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
Financial institutions were the first to begin recognizing the cards for
starting accounts that normally require proof of American citizenship.
Banks, of course, have
been quick to recognize the cards on a limited basis because the
undocumented workers' incomes provide a new source of deposits.
But employers are often
confused by the cards, mistaking them as a substitute for a US "green
card" (a temporary residency document).
And employers,
institutions and even governmental agencies are lax in checking the
legitimacy of the Matricula Consular cards; as such, the
cards have become de facto "green card" substitutes in some
circumstances in the US, allowing illegal aliens to obtain services and
rights they've been previously denied. Mexican nationals and former
Mexicans who have won legal US residency would have little if any use for
the cards.
However, FAIR's Dan
Stein points out that possession of the cards in fact establishes the
opposite of any legal status in the US: possession is proof positive that
the bearer is an illegal alien.
The Mexican government, Stein says, obviously knows it's helping its
citizens skirt US immigration law by indiscriminately handing out the
cards to any Mexican citizen who pays about US $20 to "secure"
the card; but there is suspicion by many that a black market exists and
there is anecdotal evidence that Mexican "officials" are hawking
the cards at border crossings, sometimes at premium prices.
"Since he took office,
Mexican President Vicente Fox has taken Mexico out of the closet, so to
speak," Stein recently told an audience. "It's becoming more
obvious that he's doing what he can to get as many Mexican citizens as
possible across the border into the United States."
The cards were recently
used in a pilot program in the San Francisco area, in which California
Senator Nancy Pelosi helped establish acceptance of the Matricula
Consular as proof to the state of California of legal Mexican
citizenship and, additionally, guest status in the United States. Bearers
were entitled to limited state services.
A public outcry in
California and elsewhere has ended that program after only a few weeks,
but the program only reflected the policies of some private companies that
were established months and even in some cases years ago.
Critics of Pelosi's California
plan note the political ramifications of the program: Latinos are the
fastest-growing minority population in the US (recent US Census Bureau
statistics can be interpreted to show that Latinos are already the largest
minority here) and therefore are being courted by both political
parties for future electoral strength.
Republicans have made great
inroads in attracting Latino voters, especially since Spanish-speaking
President George W. Bush has been subtly pressing the issue.
But Latinos have traditionally
leaned toward the Democratic party and Democrats are making it clear they
plan to keep Mexican immigrants, legal or illegal, in their political
camp. Hence the Pelosi program (Pelosi was recently named US House
Minority Leader).
Although the Matricula
Consular confers no legal rights to Mexicans in the United States,
recognition of the card by anyone in the US, even government agencies, is
an invitation to legal challenges, especially since use of the cards in
the US under any circumstances has not been scrutinized in court or by
legislatoin and there are few if any legal precedents.
Some politicians have
said the cards are a step forward because they allow illegal aliens to
establish identity without having to resort to forging identity documents
to obtain a home, car, employment or social services; but again,
there is anecdotal evidence that the cards are available in unspecified
quantities to any individual in Mexico who is willing to ante up the $20
or more required for each card.
So far evidence is
only anecdotal because there is no governmental or private investigation
into how the cards are obtained in Mexico.
Critics also point
out that issuance of the card is not made under strict guidelines in
Mexico; it's therefore possible for a Mexican citizen to create multiple
identities using multiple cards simply by purchasing them from officials
or on the black markets, take the cards into the US and establish a large
number of identities here, too -- if the card were accepted at the right
places, such as banks, social services and employment bureaus.
More
ominously, it's therefore possible that, if positive citizenship in Mexico
isn't established before issuing Matriculas Consular, then anyone
could get one or more of the cards and bring them into the US to present
as a valid ID.
Even
terrorists from any foreign nation -- especially terrorists who look as
though they could be Latino and who perhaps even speak Spanish.
After all, an
FBI investigation continues today into how many of the 9/11 hijackers
attempted to establish their US identities by obtaining fake drivers'
licenses; had they come in from Mexico and been able to convince
state agencies or DMVs of their authoritative use of Matriculas
Consular, they might have been able to obtain legal US state
drivers' licenses with little resistance.
"When
you think about," Stein says, "it all comes down to money, like
everything else. Businesses who hire undocumented workers would like to
have those workers have established identities," -- so there'd be no
trouble from immigration authorities -- but not have the political clout
that legal status would infer, such as ability to demand rising wages.
At
most, the Matricula Consular, therefore, establishes nothing more
than that the bearer may be a Mexican citizen presenting a Mexican
identity card, and a questionable one at that. The cards' worth as any
kind of legal documentation should be highly suspect under any conditions
-- and an invitation to lawsuits. After all, many of the cards appear to
be issued under unsupervised circumstances, and the legal nature of their
use in the US (beyond simple unconfirmed foreign IDs that establish no
rights or privileges in the US) is nebulous.
But at
worst, the cards present a very real danger of presenting an entree into
the US for terrorists. The kind of loophole the US doesn't need at this
already dangerous time.
-- Mike Shiloh
|
February 7, 2003 |